Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MEHBOOB AHMED versus JAM SOBHA


Sections 302 and 99 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the High Court remanded the case to the sessions court with the direction to resume proceedings from the stage of arguments against an accused. The position which was challenged on the ground that the High Court had stopped considering the import of Article 99, PPC, by the Supreme Court on such occasions, to inquire into the merits of the matter or to verify its accuracy, It was not advisable to comment on legal status or otherwise. The trial court's decision as to the trial court in compliance with the interim order had not yet determined the guilt or innocence of the person involved in the trial court, so it was directed in the interest of justice to release the case as soon as possible. As we move forward. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal accordingly without affecting any observations made by the High Court of Leave.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Swat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.