MIAN MUHAMMAD AMJAD AMIN versus RANA BASHIR AHMAD
Limitation Act which prohibited the application for leave on suit for recovery of money on the basis of A. XXXVII, Rr 2 (2) and 3 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 and Article 159 Pro Note The delay under contempt of section 5 was contemplated, the 1908 trial court rejected both petitions and the defendant's plea ruled that he was critically ill from 8 3 2002 to 94 2002. And although it was served on 20 3 200 2, they were delivered a copy of the plot in 10 4 2002, thus, the petition filed on 16 4 2002 was the same time as 20 3 2002. Personally presented to the plaintiff the authenticity summons showed that the plaintiff did not raise an objection at the time of the issuance of the summons, which was not provided with a copy of the claimant's Article 159 of the Act, 1908, was not provided anywhere. The deadline for filing a leave application must start from the date of delivery. Plaintiff's copy to the plaintiff
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Chowk Maitla lawyer