MUKHTAR AHMAD versus THE STATE
Defining the evidence in section 302 (b), the FIR was immediately lodged in the sentence. There was a case of one accused and one shot who first hit the upper left arm and then went to the victim's chest cavity. The complainant stated that there was no resentment on false occasions of the accused's motivated trust and was properly supported by medical evidence The perpetrator of the accused was retained in the circumstances charged by the prosecution. The mystery was made mysterious, the suspect was 18 or his age was suspected at the time of the incident; Complainant had brought improvements in a dishonest trial accused of hiding the incident, and no crime gun recovered from the suspect was not empty, there was no help in the trial. While reducing the circumstances in favor of the accused, his death sentence was changed to life imprisonment
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Swat lawyer
