Find a Lawyer

RANA MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA versus JAVED IQBAL SIDDIQUI

AR, 39, 40, 42, 55, 70, 82 and 83 (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal of the Moderator and the Deputy Registrar, by the applicants at the time of recounting of votes by the Election Tribunal. The counting of votes received was 2051, which the Tribunal received 1812 votes on the re-counting, the votes returned by the candidates when the election results were announced was 2307, which the Tribunal re-counted 1608 votes. Were found, the applicants received votes. Such re-counting was found to be higher than the returning candidates, but the tribunal declared the applicant to be null and void, announcing the selection, comparing such two personalities of the two parties proved that the polling The staff and the returning officer had it. Voting was not counted according to the essential provisions of the electoral laws. The result was prepared / announced in violation of the provisions of RR 39, 40, 42 and 55 of Punjab Local Government. Election Rules, 2000 As a complaint to the applicants, it has been raised in the election petition that the polling staff did not count the votes in accordance with the election rules and the rules prescribed under them, they were registered in the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 KR 83. Will fall within the scope of (A). After proper appreciation of the evidence, the Tribunal declared the results of the parties to the dissolution of the polling staff as corrupt and illegal practice. It was permissible that the election of the High Court was completely invalidated. Whereas Article 199 of the Constitution had no jurisdiction to exercise jurisdiction, the Tribune top advocates from Gaggo Mandi lawyer