Find a Lawyer

SHAH MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

The application for Section 302/452/354 A / 337 A / 148/149 Criminal Code (V9 1898), section 265 K, 345 (2) and 439 revoked dismissals was moved under section 265 K However, CR Parity Parties has disclosed that some of the total amount of the Revenues has been paid to the deceased's legal heirs, their affidavits have not yet been disclosed by the defendant's legal heritage defendants. Separate statements of legal heirs were not recorded by the Sessions Court at the time of confirmation of the ad interim bail before the receipt of payment was also not mentioned in his affidavit. Were. The arrest of the accused's record did not show that if the money received by the heirs collectively or individually at the bail-out stage was not considered, they could not be considered. Has the legal effect to acquit the accused. In the case, because pursuant to Section 345 (2), according to CRPC, the court seized the trial / prosecution which had to satisfy the originality and voluntary behavior of the agreement before allowing the charge itself. ? Due to a compromise between the parties at the bail-out stage in the presence of Section 311, a slip-down mere section 311 of the CRPC, the PPC empowers the court to legally waive or impose a right of detention. Convict the accused despite The deceased's heirs and, given the facts and circumstances of the case, have been sentenced to 14 years imprisonment. The ruling did not face any kind of illegal interference, dismissing the request for review within its limits. Was done. ask a advocate free from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer