Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM

Failure or error to make such a claim before the Collector in response to a notice under Section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in connection with the receipt of more than the amount paid by the Collector, section 9, 11, 1894. Impressed by the Collector under Section 11 of 1894. Such notice is served not only in relation to the amount of land acquired, but also about the value of the land, but in the absence of any claim about the amount of compensation, the interest of the collector will be served. Will have no opportunity to decide on the person's claim. Section 25, under section 18 (2) of section 25 (2) of the said Act before the phase of reference by the Collector through the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is mandatory, subject to the court's authority to fulfill such a designated reference request Could not The requirements of section 25 (2) of the Act cannot be construed to be a reference to the court's interpretation and proceeding to decide whether the court has waived such defense. The default of such reversal, unless adjudicated to the court for no good reason, is the death penalty, which means that the compensation referee court does not in any case exceed the amount paid by the collector. Such conclusive results can be ensured only if proper notice is taken under section 9 of the Act, 1894. The principles of the person interested are fully served lawer from fb area from Rajanpur lawyer