MESSRS AGHA FABRICS. (PVT) LIMITED versus UNION BANK LIMITED
The order of the appellants to recover the money received as a convenience of Section 7 and 22 cash finance was that the cash benefit was based on no legal or contractual basis. Letters from the appellant company on behalf of the appellant found that the bank's names were not denied by the appellant even after the appellant company admitted its loan and asked for further time for payment, But arguing that it was issued under a strict nature, however, the appellant either sought to defend it before the banking court. It was not explained in the holiday or before the holiday, no legal proceedings either civil or criminal, which was not initiated by the appellant to complain about the scope or in favor of the bank. Cancellation / refund of issued checks
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
