Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Section 8 Transfer Act (I82 of I82), Section 54 Civil Code (VV 1908), Section 115 Acquisition of immovable property, Oral sale, Registration of property registered for sale of unregistered sale, 1882 Applicable facts. Consistency Results The following courts have sought to recover the possession on the basis of unregistered cell receipts. In the trial case, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, and the decision and order was upheld by the appellate court that the defendants had made this receipt unregistered document of the property under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. They should not have been relied upon by the source, which was not applicable in the whole of Punjab, to issue a notification regarding this, the condition of application of the Property Transfer Property Act. There is no restriction on the sale of residential property in rural areas, as well as in rural areas. He justified both the courts' verbal sale of agricultural land or rural residential property at a cost of Rs 100 and above that the original owners could sell the suit land to the plaintiffs through the oral sale and the orders below the two courts Were. Receipt of the law relied on by the plaintiffs was not a document by which the sale was made between the original owners and the plaintiffs, therefore, this receipt was not necessarily registered under the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908. A solidarity of facts was sought against the defendants who failed to identify any evidence which was misread or unread by the courts or if there was a violation of any principle of law. us immigration advocates from Gakhar Mandi lawyer