AHMAD NAWAZ versus AKHTAR HUSSAIN
The common allegations against the Presiding Officer of the Section 526 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the Transfer of Section 362/34 case were not lasting in the eyes of the law. And made some observations. He was temporarily charged but did not challenge the High Court despite taking no action against the said order and it appeared that he did not approach the High Court with a clear hand in the transfer of the case and merely Wanted to prolong the proceedings before the trial. The trial court's decision before the trial began before the trial court had no basis for the transfer of the case. Uncertainty was that the Additional Sessions Judge had a political, philosophical or sectarian conviction with the trial. As the accused party will not guarantee the transfer of the case, the proceedings cannot be moved only under suspicion and the party's request for transfer of the case has been dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Dadu lawyer