ARIF SANA BAJWA versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, (MUSHTAQ AHMED TARAR), LAHORE AND 4 OTHERS
Sections 5 and 17A [which include the Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance (LV of 2002]] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Failure to pay such rehabilitation in interim care; Father was ordered to pay interim restitution but he did not pay the same amount and his father's defense was dismissed, the order passed by the Family Court was upheld by the appellate court, the father was taken by the Western The order to collect interim care was approved before the inclusion of Section 17A in the Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, so the same was illegal gambling. However, prior to the inclusion of Section 17A in the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, there was no special provision for the court to grant the interim reinstatement order during the period of restoration proceedings, which means It was not that if the family court was not able to pass such an order, then justice of the situation was required.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
