Section 42 Transfer Act (IV of 1882) for sale of property, sections 53A, 54 and 55 of the suit, the plaintiff's evidence claimed that the suit owned by the defendants was sold to the plaintiffs through a sale agreement. The plaintiffs in their written statement were completely denied the contract of sale with the plaintiff and to receive any money or to seize the plaintiff by any evidence of the plaintiff on the alleged sale agreement in their favor Could not prove execution and could not prove the case of occupying the suit land which is vacant, no suit land was constructed nor any Boundary wall was present, which can hardly be a matter of partial performance of the acquisition and sale agreement. Proceed in their favor, execute the sale agreement and prove the suit property, the trial court properly said that the excluded case and the appellate court were not allowed to decide the trial court's order and order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
