MUHAMMAD YOUNIS versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB
Article 135 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Request for Distributors Respondents agreed to the distribution of shared land, on which the Revenue Officer designated and approved the distribution collector's procedure filed by the respondent. The appeal was dismissed, but the EDO (R) approved their revision petition. The Board of Revenue rejected the amendment filed by the petitioner. The Validity Board of Revenue acted on the assumption that since the respondents or their shopkeepers are on common ground, they could not be bothered, such results were against the principles and principles of law distribution. This common land issue was not a matter of confirming private distribution, but rather, the Revenue Officer was called in to distribute the common land, nor was he charged with private distribution nor was it proved that the whole land. The parties themselves were in cultivation, in the joint case, in the ownership column, in the joint account of the shares they had purchased in the joint account in the Bo, regarding the classification of the land, there was no objection to the High Court ruling without legal authority. Was announced and set aside, the result being that according to the shares of the owners of the common land in Rio The order of the new officer will be restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Khuzdar lawyer