SH. MUHAMMAD UMER versus SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, HIGHWAY CIRCLE, LAHORE
R4 (1) (b) (iv) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), dismissal of appeals against the appellants against section 4 appellants against whom criminal cases were registered were prosecuted by the summary military court. And they were awarded different punishments as well. During the approval of the constitutional petitions, the respondent authority proceeded against the appellant, against the appellant, on the basis of conviction and after issuing the showcase notice in jail, the appellants were dismissed, ex parte. He could not respond by taking action. The showcase notice against them was dismissed by the High Court, accepting the constitutional petitions filed by the appellants against their conviction, saying that the alleged crimes against the appellants for more than three years were appealed by the summary military court. Violator trial is a violation of the Army Act.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Moro lawyer