MUHAMMAD MASUD UMAR KHAN versus THE LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
Section 5 Punjab Civil Servants Act (VII of 1974), Section 12 mandatory retirement official serving as Additional District and Sessions Judge, after issuing show cause notices on allegations of negative remarks in some of his ACs. Must have retired from the job. Government employees were not treated badly, but were treated as consultative public servants, during which the employees were allegedly given negative remarks against them, they were made Senior Civil Judge and then Additional District and Sessions Judge. The status quo was developed. It said that there was no obstacle to the development of the public servant, but in connection with the observations made by the appellate court regarding the cancellation of bail against the public servant, the authority on the representation of the public servant had confirmed that Was treated as well. In consultation in nature and not suitable for the service of a civil servant, under the circumstances, the conditions of section 12 of the Punjab Civil Servant Act 1974 set aside the mandatory retirement order of the public servant. had gone.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Qambar lawyer