Find a Lawyer

INAYATULLAH MALIK versus GOVERNOR OF THE PUNJAB

Rr 3, 4 (1) (b) (ii) and 5 compulsory retirement civil servants who were serving as sub divisional officers and were in charge of construction work, after charging and investigating them. There was a huge penalty for mandatory retirement. Some of the accusations were a major charge against him because of his poor management / planning, the progress of the construction work was very slow and despite the written and verbal instructions, he was able to put the work in proper perspective. Was not reasonably intensified and the cross-bandwidth under his supervision was damaged during the inquiry by the Inquiry Officer during the flooding that the charge was based on rationality and was appreciated by the inquiry chief. Was made by an engineer who specializes in this field of inquiry officer. Accepted for reasonable reasons for a reasonable and careful person how to become a advocate from Faisalabad lawyer