MST. SAID KAZABAN versus MOMIN KHAN
The requirement of the law to prove the execution of Section54 Suite E for the declaration of the sale of a letter under Section 68 of the Property Act, Article79 Transfer of Property (Article 10 of 1984), Section68 of the Evidence Act, 1982 The evidence of the 1872 Examination was witness to the document / sale agreement while the law had evidence that Article 8479 of Article 1984 1984 required at least two witnesses for the purpose of proving the execution of the document / sale dead suit. In 1983, the law was filed before the declaration of this testimony. According to the circumstances, the implementation of the sale was to be proved in the light of Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872 and thereafter it was demanded under Article 79 of the Conan Shahadat, 1984 that the matter I did not prove the sale was done by two certified witnesses. E-Martyrdom, 1984 was misunderstood
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Jalozai lawyer
