Find a Lawyer

GUL NAWAZ versus THE STATE

Section 141414 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/427/148/149 Arrest of Bail Bond and Recovery of Bond Amount, charged for which the Applicant was released on bail, trial I was seized by the court on a bail bond. To submit the bail amount, the Judge Petitioner became the guarantor of the accused, whose obligation to exclude himself was a legal obligation, and he could not say that because of his financial condition, the bonds he would receive. Cannot pay and is out of bail for the accused. There was no legal restriction on welfare and no financial benefit so that the amount of the surety bond could not be completely seized where the accused had jumped into the bond of bail. The entire amount of the bailout is suitable for confiscation. The applicant / guarantor was responsible for presenting the accused in the court under his obligation when the amount of the surety bond bond can be reduced from one lakh to fifty thousand rupees already under trial, no good. No reason The trial court's bail was available to further reduce the amount of bail, being accurate, reasonable and legal, and would not demand the intervention of the High Court. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Rashidabad lawyer