MST. ANWAR BIBI versus THE STATE
Sections 9 (c) and 25 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 103 Heroin Recovery was not denied, the fact of the arrest of the accused was not denied, there were police officers, both of them on material points. Made statements and failed to identify any contradiction in their statements. The minor contradictions that were identified were not enough to discredit the statements of the prosecution witnesses who were otherwise permanent and natural. The witnesses were not charged with any animosity or enmity so that they could be falsely implicated in the case. The witnesses deserved to be relied upon because their statements did not indicate material contradiction and no accusation of false accusation was made against the complainant or any other witness, so large. The female accused could not be asserted in the absence of heroin solids in the quantity, coercion and trespassing which the accused did not prove.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Doaaba lawyer