Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus THE STATE

Sections 204 and 419 of the Corruption Act (II of 1947), section 5 (2) of the Audit Party's definition of testimony can be construed as asserting that certain amounts were misused, but who did the work. Could not be created by report. The audit party did not highlight any other document by the prosecution in which the accused could be linked to misconduct; my report to the audit party could not be substantiated by any document, to record the accused's conviction. Could not be considered sufficient, the accused in his statement given under section 342, Cr. The PC, along with any document to show that he received any money under his handwriting or signature prosecution, was not able to prove his case against the accused, his conviction for trial and his The sentence about the sentence was set aside. best advocate from Kalaswala lawyer