ISLAMUDDIN versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD
Failure to present defendant's testimony as defendant's witnesses, Arts 31, 133 and 140, when faced with the contents of the written statement, he admitted that his father spoke to him in his presence as well. But the written statement that refused to remember its contents will be deliberately considered, thus, the legal presumption is that such contents were acknowledged by the plaintiff on the material point of view of the plaintiff. Was not challenged, the plaintiff's lawyer did not deny the existence of workshops on a plot attached to a residential building owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff's indication, therefore, would be that the defendant did not deny the plaintiff's case in connection with the workshops, factories and industrial establishments on the plot owned by him, thus, could be used as an admission in relation to the relevant facts. Is
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from North Wazirstan lawyer