MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus THE STATE
Section 2? (b) and / Constitution / 3 (Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973)), Article 185 (3) of the FIR immediately mentioned the names of the accused and the specific weapons used in the firing. The possibility of any suspicion was dismissed.It has been observed that there was no enmity with false accusations of the accused, in which case the incident took place in the light of normal day, misidentification or substitution. There was no possible medical evidence to substantiate the account of the incident and there was no compelling evidence on its own. He was not sufficiently confused to read any false statement or evidence and did not demand any interference by the Supreme Court in the constitutional jurisdiction, according to which the accused was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Khurian wala lawyer
