Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus THE STATE


Section 2? (b) and / Constitution / 3 (Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973)), Article 185 (3) of the FIR immediately mentioned the names of the accused and the specific weapons used in the firing. The possibility of any suspicion was dismissed.It has been observed that there was no enmity with false accusations of the accused, in which case the incident took place in the light of normal day, misidentification or substitution. There was no possible medical evidence to substantiate the account of the incident and there was no compelling evidence on its own. He was not sufficiently confused to read any false statement or evidence and did not demand any interference by the Supreme Court in the constitutional jurisdiction, according to which the accused was denied.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.