Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAH versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KOHAT

Section 31 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Pre-Ruling Case, Under Section 115 of the Appellate Court Amendment Jurisdiction, Section of the North West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1987 31, not to issue notices under CPC Appeals Wendy's tried to refuse to dismiss it because of a ban on the defendant, because the same lawsuit was filed 120 days after the Revenue Authority confirmed the change, pre-emptor claimed. Was filed in this case from the date of the change since no notice was given. The Trial Court of Appeal Court rejected the request for a hearing of the Revenue Authorities required under Section 31 of the North West Frontier Province Pre-Emission Act, 1987, and dismissed the time-limit case and adjudicated Was retained. The court, exercising the correctness of constitutional jurisdiction, raised the question that government proceedings were not provided under section 31 of the North-West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act 1987, it is important that the trial court compile a case, giving evidence to the parties. And then decide the dispute. The trial court's ruling was exactly in accordance with the law, therefore, this was not a valid case of interference by the appellate court under section 115, GPC, as the trial court's jurisdiction over any jurisdiction No such irregularities were committed. The High Court's decision in the constitutional petition also suffered the same legal weakness that could not be sustained by the High Court and the Appellate Court. advocate from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer