MUHAMMAD MAQSOOD AHMED versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT
R4 (1) (b) of the Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal Act (XII of 1991), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3), for the absence of duty from the services imposed by the Tribunal. Was changed The mandatory retirement of a civil servant was that the Tribunal observed, in view of the baseless service record, deserved gentle treatment, but the substitution of a larger fine with any other major penalty was inconsistent with such results. As is evident from the unidentified verdict; the tribunal was influenced by the fact that he had received the leave of former Pakistan to go to Canada to attend the wedding, but instead of moving there, he went to the United States, which is a charge sheet. Thus, discretion was used on the matter of quantum. Penalties had a bad effect on his prejudice. That it requested an extension of leave on medical grounds with the help of a medical certificate sent from abroad, which could not be prohibited under the rules.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
