Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD SAEED

Section 12 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), the specific performance of the agreement to sell the document preferential rule on the section 48 oral agreement was referred to the plaintiff in the execution of the verbal agreement applicable to the sale. The suit landowner was later hanged. On the basis of another sale agreement in favor of them, the defendant was dismissed by the registered sale deadline court, but the appellate court allowed the appeal and the plaintiff ruled in favor of the decision and the order was passed. ? The appellate court held that the amended jurisdiction taken by the defendants by the High Court held that the sale agreement in favor of the plaintiff was an unregistered document which could not be declared a contract for sale, while their There was agreement in favor. Registered document, therefore, the document in favor of the plaintiff could not be implemented by Validity Apple, after the fact that the court and the High Court had taken into consideration the terms of the document in favor of the plaintiff and the evidence presented by the parties. Given that this is a sales contract, therefore, it may be implemented as such, in order to obtain a specific registration document or a specific rule for obtaining Wendy under the contract, the registered document will take precedence over the unregistered document. The application will not apply in the context of section 48 of the Respondents of the Registration Act, 1908, in its written statement Of them admitted that it was the claimant under the contract sales agreement, therefore, Registration Act can not claim any benefit under section 48 of 1908, on the grounds that the defendants online advocate from Depal Pur lawyer