Find a Lawyer

MIAN GHULAM MUSTAFA versus CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST PUNJAB

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Before the service tribunal, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal requesting the removal of the respondents (the main competitor in the appeal) on the request of the appellant's lawyer because there was no relief. Could find The appellant's view of the appeal against the deleted respondent is that such cancellation was caused by an inadvertent error, which could have been exercised by the hereditary jurisdiction, and the trial court's correction could be amended as such There was no matter of correction of such an order could not be made without review of such order. The power of review cannot be exercised in an arbitrary manner, unless, under the law, any review was awarded to the service tribunal, such an order was free of any ambiguous and free indication that such an endorsement was obvious. I was summoned and accordingly his name was removed advocates from Burewala lawyer