Find a Lawyer

S.M. ALI GOHAR versus MANAGING DIRECTOR

Regulation 11 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 11 (2) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), delay in service in filing sections 2A and 4, condolences on the service of the public servant almost five years later. Job Canceled The appointment was made solely on the basis that their services were not required by the employer. The corporation government employee, appointed according to the prescribed procedure, was kept on probation for a period of six months and the corporation may terminate after the completion of the said probationary period. The House Building Finance Corporation provides the services of public servants under Regln 11 of the Service Regulations, 1959, if it acts in the interests of the corporation without any discrimination or goodwill on external affairs, if the dismissal of a public employee. The order was not in the interest of the corporation. , But as a result of discrimination and violating the principles of natural justice, select and select a policy that was against the principles of Lost in First Out (LIFO) under section 11 (2) of the Civil Servants Act, 1973 Violation of the employment of public servants was legally unlawful and was also based on the distortion of facts. The order to terminate the services of a public servant was, by the respondent corporation, illegal, to anyone, transparent, fair. And was subjected to equal partisanship and misconduct, was not sustainable in law, the service tribunal employed The delay in filing an appeal against the dismissal order, the government employee's appeal accepted, was set aside. Orders to terminate his services and orders his reinstatement into the service lawer from fb area from Haripur lawyer