RR 4 (1) (b) (iv), 5 and 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) for the dismissal of service and the purchase of appointment on the basis of the fraudulent matriculation card, which was also removed by the official. Prior to the employee's confirmation, the dismissal of the employment imposed by the authority was maintained by the state employee's service tribunal plea that such a false case was manipulated by the office's superintendent, who took it from him. Angry and nurturing was found on loan demand. He was terminated from the job as a result of the malice against him. Such pleading and demeanor was considered because no evidence was proved of the same, neither was the receipt showing the payment of the loan nor was it mentioned that it had ever been defamed before. Didn't happen Charges were leveled against the inquiry officer, the authorized officer and the authorized authority, who could not influence the office superintendent for being a little good in the organization.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
