Find a Lawyer

RAJA AMIR MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

Section 409/261/262/263/34 Sindh Inquiries and Anti-Corruption Rules, 1993, R11 Pakistan Criminal Law Amendment Act (XL of 1958), SA (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Trial Court The CCP, in rejecting the plea of the accused under Section 249A, held that the Special Judge, under section 4 (1) of the Pakistan Criminal Law Amendment Act 1958, confessed to any offense within its territorial limits. Has jurisdiction. Upon receipt of a complaint of fact based on such offense under the aforesaid act, or upon receipt of such factual report by a police officer, and since the trial court has already committed the offense on the challan presented to the accused Has been acknowledged. D-Section P was, in fact, a report of facts found to be guilty by the accused, therefore, in contravention of the provisions of Section 4 (1) of the Pakistan Crime, violation of the Sindh Inquiries and Anti-Corruption Rules 1993 R11. The Analogy Law Amendment Act 1958 will not and will not affect the trial High Court, thus, the trial court's order was properly upheld by a good logical decision passed within the parameters of the law, Appeal was not allowed accordingly law firms from Talagang lawyer