Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAKIR KHAN- versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

RR 6A & 7 (1) Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975, R12 (A) (B) Sindh Civil Servants Act (XV of 1973), Sections 8 and 24 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) , Article 212 (3) Severity Protection of Applicant Services in Harmony with the Local Government Department of the Province in the Case of Sanitary Petitioner Employed by a legislative body, the government chose to absorb permanent exposure to the government, provided that its services were provided under the law as R-12 (A), Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Confirmation and Sanity) Rules 1975. Be given under The applicant was appointed accordingly by the transfer to the Government Department until the applicant's notification passed R12 (b), Sindh Civil Servant (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975. Which was stated that after the appointment, transfer to the request of the administrator after the appointment, he would require junior status from all other persons appointed before him on a regular basis; on the case of the applicant, the appropriate department publicity. At the time of its appointment by the Committee, the benefit of R is 12 (a), Government employees of Sindh (Probation, Certification and Sennar Or) the Rules can not be extended in 1975 on the first may be assigned for this purpose. A summary should have been presented to the Chief Minister for enmity with the applicant and his sentiment, which may be capable of easing large-scale rules in the public interest of the applicant, however, in the case of hardship there would be no sanity. A civil servant's right to a CRL did not give him any jurisdiction to support the doctrine of Lux punctuality. ask a advocate free from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer