AMIR SHAHBAZ, DIRECTOR, WORKS AND SERVICE DEPARTMENT versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P
R7A North West Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (Constitution of 1974), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 13 and 212 (3) Annual increase, withholding department inquiry The principle of double risk enforcement authority and service tribunal The civil servant was involved in the construction of the bridge because the sub-divisional officer found some technical defects in the construction of the bridge and a departmental inquiry was initiated even though the civil servant was found innocent and the inquiry officer dismissed his sentence, Still, the accusation officer imposed a reopening penalty a year later, and the government The inquiry was started, but the charge sheet had been dismissed because of some reasons, was once again released a new charge sheet with the charges in the third inquiry. A third inquiry into the government employee's retrieval of the same allegations, preventing three jobs on a penalty imposed by civil servants by government employees, was maintained by the service tribunal's second Imposing a bar is a double risk. As a result of a comprehensive investigation, he was blamed for not following the precision and alignment that could have led to not only the devastation with the bridge's customers but also the technical, knowledgeable and professional skills of the civil servant. Provides information. Inquiries could be made to cover up the fact that the authorities had given a minor punishment for stopping three increments which did not correspond to the attractiveness of charges that could be increased by a competent authority while increasing the fine.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Alipur lawyer