MUMTAZ AHMAD versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN
Sections 10, 22 and 25 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 4 Deletion of leave application by a one-day restriction on the appellant's personal services The affirmative appellant was introduced on 30 8 2002 Vacation Request 30 9 Filed 2002 because 29 of the 2002 Act, Section 4 of the Limitation Act, 1908, does not extend to the limitation period prescribed by law, but rather allows the filing, appeal or application to be re-opened by the court. If the limitation period ends on the day the court closes. The appellant should not be prejudiced by any act of the court i.e. his closure was removed by the Banking Court in the wrong way in regard to the application of the law, the High Court accepted the appeal, the unclean decision / decree a And the case is remanded to the Banking Court to decide the application for leave to defend in this case. In accordance with the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Kotli lawyer