DR. MUHAMMAD RASHID KHAN versus SECRETARY HEALTH, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE
Article 199 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Constitution Petition The intruder appellant concealed the material facts at the time of filing the constitutional petition and obtained the order from the High Court, without imposing any defendant, which was a necessary party and Without challenging its wires. The order of appointment of the respondent as a constitutional jurisdiction is arbitrary and whoever seeks equality must appear before the court with clean hands, but in the present case the appellant does not approach the HC with clean hands. Because he had suppressed material facts from the court. The High Court, in its constitutional jurisdiction, had, in the circumstances, deemed it unlawful to exercise discretion in favor of the appellant and thereupon the constitutional petition was rightly dismissed, any weakness in the High Court decision. Or in the absence of illegal proceedings, the decision cannot be interrupted. In the intra-court appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Dudial lawyer