Find a Lawyer

MESSRS INTERCITY TRANSPORT SYSTEM versus JUDGE, BANKING COURT NO.II, LAHORE

Claims for implementation of a concession scheme issued by the bank after the passage of the section 19 decree was not compatible with the execution of the provision of any privileged scheme approved by the appellate court. The decision had to be implemented by a court of enforcement. Under its terms, the implementing court did not have the authority to withdraw or amend the injunction on the basis of any privileged scheme, which was passed on 15 1 1995. , But the decision-maker did not even pay a single rupee, thus, was not entitled to claim benefits from the incentive scheme. Which requires the borrower, as a condition, to deposit the required amount under the Incentive Scheme within the stipulated time. us immigration advocates from Mangowal lawyer