Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD ASIF versus THE STATE

S: 498 Statutory Regulation (XLV of 1860), Sections 380/409 Banking Tribunals Ordinance (LVIII of 1984), Sections 2 (d) and 5 (6) Guarantees, jurisdiction of the Banking Court jurisdiction against the accused The reason was that under the Act, the complainant was deprived of the property kept in the bank locker which was in question when the bank had hired the complainant woman and in his articles it was found that the locker was stolen. It was reported that the bank had not taken any responsibility for securing the goods which were lying. At Locker Bank and in this case, the first person, the employee who was an employee of the bank, could not know the contents of the locker. law firms from Diamer lawyer