Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN, SARHAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, PESHAWAR versus MESSRS SAID ANWAR & COMPANY

OI, R 10 & O IX, RAI Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appeal of the Supreme Court was adopted by the Provincial Government to consider the significance and import of the contract and whether it was Can be equated. Enforced by entering into an agreement and filing a lawsuit for specific performance. Will such a case be feasible and will the move have the necessary impact on the provincial government? Who was the owner of the land about which the Provincial Government had signed an agreement. It also included the promise of the provincial government regarding land below the disputed property of the adjoining land. Whether the possession of the disputed property was handed over to the respondent who was seized without protest. Whether it is a matter of wrong parties or non-participation of the required parties and the application made for the necessary parties to be served in accordance with the law, or otherwise. If the plaintiff is sued for unlawful gain with indirect and malicious motives for avoiding the obligation and obligation to pay the money for the purchase of the disputed property; whether between the provincial government parties. Be a party to the transaction. Can an order of consent be impeded by the provincial government when only the consent has been given by the applicant and can the provincial government file an appeal against a default action taken against it earlier? online advocate from Upper Dir lawyer