MUHAMMAD ANWAR AZIM versus R.I. G.B. EDUCATION BOARD
Section 21A, Proviso [hereinafter inserted Sindh Rented Premises (Amendment) Ordinance (XIV of 2001)] Constitution of Pakistan \ (1973), Article 185 (3) Notification of the Sindh Government, which dates from 14 to 2001 appeals. The decision was made by the High Court instead of transferring the District Judge to the High Court to be disposed of pursuant to Section 21, A, Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance, 1979 [as filed by the Amendment Ordinance 2001] below. The final outcome of the tactics recorded by the courts, which ordered the eviction of the tenant, were questions about the fact and the courts' right to decide It was held that the High Court had considered the matter in its proper point of view and its decision was based entirely on facts and proper definition of law and was not open to it. The appeal was denied on the exception of the High Court order
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
