MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
R (()) (B) (iv) Sacked government employee, was dismissed after inquiring against him on charges of serving as a Section I policeman, illegally recovering An inquiry was launched on the allegation that his wife and children were abducted by the complainant, who went to the police station to file a case for abduction, but he demanded bribe and complained to him. The employer has to sell his domestic articles and two bills to pay the bribe to a civil servant. Inquiries regarding the recovery of his wife and children were properly conducted by the DSP police against A Section I Government employee gave the DSP time and opportunity to join the inquiry process and notice. They were properly presented, but they did not participate in the inquiry. According to the accused, the proceedings which were taken in the light of available records were not presented to the authority despite the notice which their FA received. Were. Miley, being a member of the civil servant discipline, could not be absent from her charge of whispering, which led to her being dismissed from the job after being fully proven, in order to justify her dismissal. Cannot be interrupted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
