Section 497 (5) of the Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), 5 302/34 bail, was a mass murder case involving at least two eyewitnesses who, although related to the complainant, The proof of that was just as good. When no other witness had any independent testimony available, the trial court erred in going to trial and finding evidence, contradicting ocular testimony and medical evidence, the reliability of eyewitnesses and the defendant based on it. The possibility of making false accusations. The enmity between the parties was a matter that could not be appreciated at trial, nor was the accused, first felon, involved in the crime phase, and no further investigation was required in the case. , Bail was allowed. The trial court acquitted the accused in circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2004
