Five unidentified gunmen were allegedly snatched from Section 497 Property Crimes (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) Sanctions (XLV of 1860), Section 170/171/468/471 bail. The complainant identified the accused in the identification test that took place nine days after his arrest, which, due to the delay, could not constitute a dismissal of the crime, according to the prosecutor's counsel, while excluding the bail. In the plea, it was observed that the accused was arrested on suspicion, but was identified in the identity parade, although independent witnesses were not present, further investigation into the cases was required and accordingly he was granted bail. Was also admitted on.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
