UNITED BANK LIMITED, BANK SQUARE BRANCH, LAHORE versus FATEH HAYAT KHAN TIWANA
Section 8 (3) of the Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), section 48 and O XXI, Rr 11 (2), 13 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), limiting the implementation of Article 181, the bank obtained the order dated 20 1 1981 What was the first execution request, was first filed with the bank on 27 6 1983 during execution, the petition withdrew the miscellaneous application under O 11 XX, R 13, CPC, according to which the bank had to file its proper application. No appropriate request was filed, but 16 filed a new enforcement request. 1989A XXI, R 11 (2), with the Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) section 8 (3) of the Ordinance read by CPC, the first execution request in 1979 recorded on the bank's request 7 2 1989 The latest hanging petition to be filed was rejected by the banking court's latest request for execution because the ban was filed after eight years after the order was approved. Subsequently, the request for execution was not in continuation of the miscellaneous request which led to the withdrawal of the same on 23 11 1983 as SAM. E was not a central request for implementation which was later assigned to file a fresh implementation request on the bank's special request to record 7 198 2 1989, followed by the application for various directions such as Such a miscellaneous request could not be excluded, but the execution request was within time, the same process was stopped by Article 48, CPC.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
