Find a Lawyer

MEHMOOD ASIF BUTT versus DISTRICT JUDGE, GUJRANWALA

Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition filed in the case against his father, for recovering the past and future restitution amount, the plaintiff filed Rs. 24,70,000. Restitution allowance and Rs 10,000 claim Syria's case for future care was resisted by the defendant that the plaintiff and his mother had earlier filed a lawsuit for restitution allowance, but returned it Was dismissed because the plaintiff's mother had paid Rs 27,000 and gold jewelery in connection with the recovery of the plaintiff after the dismissal of the earlier case. The plaintiff was not applicable to the case, the trial court and the appellate court ordered the accused to pay 2000, at as maintenance allowance to the claimant for the total period of 3/2 years. The marriage agreement was reached by a majority acquisition. In the first case, the plaintiff was granted restitution allowance until the age of majority, but even after attaining the age of majority until her marriage, the plaintiff remained with her mother because the plaintiff was the father of the plaintiff. Provided that the plaintiff was entitled to receive such care from the father even if he obtained the majority. Unless he is married, the second case filed by the plaintiff on the basis of proper examination of the entire contents on record by the courts and the absence of any form of illegality and vulnerability. The decision was made, the constitutional petition cannot be interfered with. advocate for immigration from Naseerabad lawyer