MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus THE STATE
Regarding the alleged kidnapper in his statement to the investigating officer 14 days after the crime of Section 498 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) / 16 pre-arrest bail, the matter was granted to the police. Told. The prosecution's witnesses stated that no one had committed adultery with their complainant, nor had they presented an affidavit to the Investigation Officer, which they said had caused some misunderstanding against the accused. His case was registered and the charges were already included in the investigation. Both the complainant and the abductor were making different statements to the police
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Mamu kunjan lawyer
