Section 12 and 54 Convene Testimony (10 of 1984), Section 59 suit for the specific performance of a contract to sell expert opinion, after the deposition of minor witnesses, the plaintiff compares his signature or thumb impression to the expert's writings. The petitioner but failed to do so, with the recovery of Rs. 750,000, the execution of the contract also proved that the defendant did not own 92 kanal of arable land. The 2-Marl agreement works only against the defendant. Claiming that if the plaintiff does not own the land measuring 92 Kanal 2 Marla it was proved that the plaintiff did not measure 58 Kanal 6 Marla. He would be liable to deduct the equivalent of his share, therefore, the plaintiffs were not entitled to any reduction in the agreed price. The appellate party was allowed by the High Court to reduce the defendant's land to 58 Kanal 6 Marla. However, the other terms of the defamation order will remain the same
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
