The definition of Section 302 (b) Qatil-e-Amad evidence is used in the complainant's statement and in the statement of the other four witnesses of the prosecution, who have accused the victim in front of the police injury. The defendant's character and co-accused were acquitted, and not distinguished from the defendant's case, saying that the defendant's motive in the prosecution's case against the accused was not found to be autonomous and the recovery of rifle 222 It is alleged that boredom is not considered to be the definitive piece of evidence against the accused. No suicide can be done which was available to the accused. There was evidence of the prosecution, which was denied and he was acquitted of the accused. The accused could not be trusted against the accused, in the circumstances the role of the accused is extremely There was a contradiction and the suspected role attributed to the suspect, W, also contradicts the victim's complainant's post-mortem report. He improved his statements to bring his evidence into line with the medical evidence. Gone, the prosecution's case was full of circumstances, serious doubts were raised about the prosecution's story that the prosecutor had failed to prove his case against the accused beyond doubt. The conviction, sentence and sentence imposed by the trial court was set aside, acquitting him of the charge Was given what he had taken advantage of the doubt and he was, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
