Find a Lawyer

BRIG. (R) SAJID IMTIAZ HUSSAIN versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF COMMERCE

Article 199 Constitution Petition The civil service was dismissed from the charge of reinforcing applicants for regular dismissal of employment The applicant was not allowed to explain his case, nor was he given any reason to notice. The reason for the notice or regular inquiry that was issued was not necessary to conduct an inquiry in each case as it depends on the circumstances of the case that the service of an employee may be terminated without regular inquiry. The authority can provide you with an inquiry, especially when the employee's b Oops had been detected were charged. A proven constitutional application based on documentary evidence was dropped

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• MUHAMMAD SALEEM alias CHHEMU v. State 2013 YLR 1456
• NAZAR ELAHI v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2013 CLC 1457
• MUHAMMAD JAMIL v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1458
• JAVED IQBAL v. State 2013 MLD 1463
• BANK OF PUNJAB v. INTERNATIONAL CERAMICS LTD. 2013 CLD 1472
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. State 2013 YLR 1478
• NADEEM SARWAR v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN through Election Commissioner, Punjab 2013 CLC 1481
• IFTIKHAR-UL-HASSAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1486

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

law firms from Chitral lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes