ENGINEER JAMEEL AHMED MALIK versus PAKISTAN ORDINANCE FACTORIES BOARD, WAH CANTT
Rr 2 (4) and 4 (1) (b) (ii) Government Employees (Practices) Rules, 1964, Rr 22 and 29 The mandatory retirement from service charge against a public servant was that he addressed the press conference and Issued flags criticizing his administration and talked about the latest events in the New World Order and the geopolitical situation, and letters to top officials, including the country's president and prime minister, overlooking the general process in this regard. Addressing a public servant did not deny these facts, but emphasized that whatever it was, it was said that the right justification was for a public servant to allow free speech. God is not in the vicinity of the circle which will discuss the latest events in the New World Order and the geopolitical situation. Such behavior by a public servant would be a violation of RR 22 and 29 of a public servant. Practices) 64 Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, R4 (4) in the meaning of Rule 1973, and such misconduct against such a widely publicized public servant Ed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
