MALIK GHULAM NABI JILANI versus MST. PIRZADA JAMILA
Article 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The dissolution of marriage based on khula based on the provision of race jostata in Nik nakanama, preventing the wife from going to the family court for divorce on the basis of khula. The husband of the dispute was that because of such a situation, the wife could not try to dissolve the marriage and had earlier withdrawn the case to dissolve the marriage, therefore, the principles of the judiciary applied in this case, I found this condition valid by Waldetti Family Court. There was no legal requirement that the spouse prevented his wife from going to court for divorce on the land of Khulla, which could not prevent the wife from dissolving on the land of Khulla. The competent court family court also correctly submitted the evidence on record. Look what it was. It was not possible to live together in the boundaries of Allah among the parties; the findings of the Family Court were confirmed by the High Court, indicating the lack of evidence by the husband and the subsequent claim of dissolution of the marriage on the basis of khula. The ban was not banned because in such cases the party may find recurring reasons for it. Khulla's land was refused permission to appeal on behalf of his wife for dissolution of marriage
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Wah Cantt lawyer