GHULAM MUHAMMAD TIWANA versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, INDUSTRIES AND MINERAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Applicants applying R15 license, first-come-in-principle grant, expired earlier applicant's license, and applicants for the same authority granted license in favor of the applicant under the first-come-first rule because it The first application was made. Respondents denied the order at 30 in the morning of 12, 1989, for grant of licenses in favor of the appellant and the High Court under constitutional jurisdiction. Between 15 6 1989 and 16 6 1989, therefore, the respondents' petition filed at 10.30 am on 15 6 1989 was preceded by the petitioner raised by the appellant that he made the first on 12 6 1989 at 11 am. Had applied. While the second petition was filed at 8 am-8pm on 17 6 1989, the SS Punjab Mining Concession Rules, 1986, were entitled to license under Merrill's R15. y Because it has been found that the application made by the respondent was premature, there was no basis for assuming that the defendant was entitled to grant the license, as the Punjab Mining Concession Rules of Rule 15 of 1986 The authorities concerned were given the option to deviate from the preceding rule for reasons previously recorded and could deny such applicants a license grant, and the competent authority also had the option to Provide prospective licenses through sealed bids or on open paths. The auction order sanctioned by the High Court was set aside and the case is subject to the question of the expected license supply in view of the provision of R15 of the Punjab Mining Concession Rules 1986.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
