SULEMAN versus THE STATE
Further investigation against the accused was found in section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 324/353/147/149, when the police party raided the house of the accused for the recovery of drugs. Those present attacked. No one was injured in the incident, and it was fired ineffectively by those on the spot. Other co-accused on similar land were released on bail, the accused was eventually acquitted under section 13D of the West. The Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, ruled against the rule of consistency and the fact that it was allegedly an effective shooting and the accused was acquitted by the trial court under section 13D of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965. Further investigation was carried out. Guaranteed, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Murree lawyer
