Find a Lawyer

ASHRAF versus THE STATE

Section 302 (a) / 34/4 32 evidence / 6 316 Definition of evidence alleges that even though he was armed with hatchets, he had struck the wrong side of the hatchets even as the main accused, who There was a blow to the head of the deceased, he did not use the sharp side. The hatchet doctor who presented the evidence dismissed that it was a case of neurology and that the deceased, who remained in the hospital for 4 days, died due to inadequate treatment for a strong cause for the murder. Didn't have The late friend cannot be established. It was alleged that he used the latter part of a hatchet, which generally did not cause death according to nature, but for the purpose of damaging the body only, the crime of the accused was punished under section 316. , The PPC element deprived the accused of the other three suspects because there was no evidence available because the evidence on record was not sufficient to show that any motive was to kill the accused and the evidence. According to the ence on record, the three suspects suffered injuries to the prosecution witnesses and said the injuries were easy in nature and that Section 337A (i) was covered under PPC for which the accused was liable for punishment and was sentenced to two years as the accused has been sentenced. Under section 2302/4 PP4, the PPC was set aside and all of them were acquitted. The main accused was convicted under Section 66 31, PPC and was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and will also be guilty of payment of dait according to law. female advocates from Kandiaro lawyer